User blog comment:A Wikia Contributor 9337/The (im)morality of flaming/@comment-27021229-20151116165227/@comment-25926644-20151117003558

I'm not forbidding freedom of speech, I'm just telling how to not start flame from those ideas or what you should do if you see flame. Also, you can't really compare the Socrates' ideas with most of the flame-causing ideas here because Socrates was so much more important.

There is right and wrong, but like with the handkanone flame, it wasn't necessary to know who is right. IT WASN'T IMPORTANT. Also, when other people brought up their ideas to support who was right, it just made more flame. That's why you should ignore flame if it has little to do with you. Same happened with a lot of other flame wars.

I'll admit that I was a bit contradictory, if flame is centered on a rather important topic, you probably should support which side.

Also, a lot of flaming was in the chat quite some time ago, so you've missed out a bit.

Minor note about what you said about "spinless jackasses": If I admitted I were one right now, it would be contradictory. I would no longer be one since I admitted it, but I can still act like one otherwise.