User blog:SkyrunnerM35/Striker vs. Heartburn

'K, so I found a butt-ton of people on both the Striker and the Heartburn page saying they prefer the Heartburn because it's better. Although that's simply not true. Here's why. (P.S.: Most of you guys were probably expecting this post from me. =D) VS.

First: the stats and comparison. Second: the comments and notes.

So basically:

Striker Wins: 4

Heartburn Wins: 2

Ties: 4

Depends/ Doesn't matters: 3

Now let me discuss the depends/ doesn't matters. The doesn't matter bits are the bits that, well, don't matter. You could classify the Striker as a shotgun and it wouldn't affect its performance. The company that made it doesn't really matter but people tend to prefer the Heartburn even though it's worse because it's Rancor, which is seen as a late-game company, whereas Rubicon is seen as an early-game company. Personally though, I prefer Rubicon as Rancor hasn't really impressed me too much whereas apart from the RIA 50 and DSC, Rubicon has NEVER disappointed me. Now as for the only "Depends" bit. The Heartburn is full-auto and fires at 6 rounds a second while the Striker is semi-auto and fires at 10 rounds a second. This is another reason why people prefer the Heartburn. Personally, I don't find the semi-auto capabilities annoying when clicking at 6-8 rounds a second although some people do. But most people click at 4 times a second at worst and possibly 10-12 at best. Also, while appearance doesn't really matter, I think the Striker looks more awesome than the Heartburn.