Thread:The Augster at NK/@comment-14605733-20151112223432/@comment-27021229-20151114010248

Robobot1747 wrote: Thomas the Tank MLGine wrote: Robobot1747 wrote: " You have no right to take away my ability to talk" His site, his rules. And no, the First Amendment does not apply for you, he has a First Amendment right to control what speech is hosted on his site. The first ammendment doesn't say anything about authority dictating what is and isn't acceptable speech. All it says is that you have freedom of speech, religion, and opinion. It's meant to protect unpopular speech, since popular speech doesn't need protection. The First Amendment protects speech from goverment censorship. There is no protection from an admin/mod on someone else's site. If I run a site, I can ban you for disagreeing with me or anything at all really; you're not censored, you can go somewhere else, including making your own site. That doesn't mean that you're not a total scum fuck king shit cup. I think you should hold the hold yourself to the same standards as others, and either way Wikia staff have power above all admins and even bureaucrats; this wiki is just another part of wikia, therefore all admins and bureaucrats on this wiki have to abide by wikia's rules, and wikia says you can't discriminate for any reason.

And that's not just discrimination for things like sexuality or skin tone or gender; that's just physical differences. Discriminating and dictating what people's choices and speech have to be is even worse than that. You can't tell anyone what they think, and you can't tell them what they enjoy or dislike.

Government censorship sure whatever but I think that the first amendment should be universally applicable to everyone. I mean if you as the admin are fucking benefitting from it then I don't think banning someone who's only exercising the same god damn right as you is justifiable by any means unless you're hypocritical or insane.