Talk:RIA 15 SE/@comment-26659606-20150915233047/@comment-98.169.4.13-20150918031708

To me, it seems like you don't understand the concept of "pay to win." You deem SAS 4 as such just because money was spent on a free flash game. So, what was the $20 spent on? Could be anything, but it will not give the spender any significant advantage because you forgot to factor in the player's skill, which makes a world of a difference.

The fact that hacks exist which allow you to get better guns make the premiums not p2w. Plus, weren't you talking about how most of the premiums get outclassed by some of the better guns (e.g. [RED] Shockfield, Sub-light, etc.)? If you can get those guns, legitimate or not, there's pretty much no motive to get premiums, am I right? With no motive, no money is spent, and nothing happens to either the consumer or NK.

Don't get me wrong, I'm only trying to defend that SAS 4 is not p2w. Even with outrageous prices, premiums don't give any better advantage compared to the normal player.