User blog comment:Doue/SAS Conception Wiki/@comment-16137132-20140821001134/@comment-28857013-20140821173235

For the palette stuffs, it is further fixable, so it isn't a good thing to argue with anymore.

for the advertising thing, wrong point. Does paying to advertise make it not called advertised? Something being advertised doesn't mean it is bad, and that's what I'm trying to claim.

For the criticism, my example still holds a point: If there are something you don't like but is good for you, you can't say you thus shouldn't do so, if you don't get it yet. Criticism is a way for one to know what's wrong with something, and thus to improve it. Your previous arguments showed that you agree with this.

About your preferences with having blogs or a separate wiki, they are actually similar. If you looked at Bloons Conception Wiki (BCoW) for reference, you can see the stuffs are just sorted as well. It's the problem of mixing canons and fanons together as someone previously did at Bloons Wiki which caused the admins there to set a separate wiki (and eventually became 2 independent wikis) This foresees the future of putting canons and fanons in one wiki. And that's the reason why we did these Conception Wiki projects.