User blog:SkyrunnerM35/COM2 vs. Hornet

'K, so after making my "Striker vs. Heartburn" blog post, I decided to make another one, this time concerning the Hornet and the COM2. Now, I love both, but the COM2 has driven me bananas with its small clip AND its long reload time. (Separately, not so bad) However, many people have said that the COM2 is better than the Hornet. I will now quote some examples: So here we go again. First: stats and comparison. Second: the comments and notes.
 * (From Gun Reviews) Pootis Man 28-09-2014: Not the "poor mans" hornet, it's the "realistic mans" hornet. Crunch the damage numbers, and you'll see the only real differnce is pierce and movement speed. (com2 has more pierce but less movement speed). The clip is identical, and the generally recognized largest difference of ammo cost. The com2 ammo is less than a quarter the cost of the hornets.
 * (From Mixmaster comment, by Bryan Kwok) "Im not sure Hornet is better than Sublight. Sublight ammo is cheaper and the damage type wins over the hornet."
 * Not to mention the butt-ton of fanboys for the COM2 that drive me bananas more than Striker fanboys like yours truly annoy Ragriz Ghost: (All from comments) ">not using the god's gun Sub light COM 2; peasant lol" and "Sub light is masterace; fact; gg peasants keep losin'." Then when I replied to him, he said: "sure keep being pwned lol." Continuing on: "sub light h8ers are mad; fact; get rekt 360 nonscoped" and "This gun is sooooo masterrace. RED ARS have got no level compared to this baby."

So basically:

COM2 Wins: 2

Hornet Wins: 4

Ties: 5

Depends/ Doesn't matters: 2

Looking at this, it's more even than the Striker vs. the Heartburn, but the Hornet wins. Again, company and weapon category don't matter, but I'll give my opinion anyway. I don't really like Critical Mass apart from a few of their weapons, but Shotlite has been more reliable for me. Not really as much to explain as Striker vs. Heartburn, so I'll stop here. This is SkyrunnerM35, signing off. (That's my own outro.)